Pressure/Force (the core result):

• Depth range: 156–170 ft below sea level

• Resulting gauge pressure: ~69–75 psi

• Applied over effective hydraulic area: ~200–270 sq ft

• Total force: ~2,000,000 lbs (checks out arithmetically at both ends of the range)

Geometry — theoretical/idealized shaft profile:

• Vertical rise: 176 ft (from –156 ft to +20 ft crest)

• Horizontal run: ~115–120 ft

• Two-stage gradient: ~66° for the initial steep lift (–156 ft to –100 ft), easing to ~20° near the +20 ft crest

• Average ascent angle (straight-line): arctan(176/120) ≈ 55.7°

Geometry — real-world terrain-adjusted (per shaft):

• Horizontal run: ~400–500 ft

• Vertical rise: still 176 ft

• Average angle: ~21–24°

• Two shafts combined: ~900–1,000 ft total ≈ 300 m

Component lengths (separate from the main conduit):

• Fingerling drains: ~60 ft

• Valve/box section: ~15–20 ft

Metric “La Formule” values:

• Shaft depth: ~30–36 m

• Drain length: ~120–150 m

• Tidal head: ~1.5–2.0 m tidal range

• Slope to finger drains: ~1:20

• Water volume: ~12,000–15,000 m³ per tidal cycle

• Flow rate: ~0.8–1.2 m³/s on high tide

This math I created actually checks out as a real calculation, not just a fitted number to fit a pig pen, cipher created by I believe Pierre Puget himself:

I also argue. He did not write the side field notes and the map. Those were from a foreign scribe hired to follow Pierre on Oak Island

Here is the full value of the Zena Helpern Document La formula

Shaft parameters that hold la value

Within the money pit shaft holds

69-75 psi over ~200-270 sq ft — taking the low end (69 psi × 200 sq ft × 144 sq in/sq ft) gets you to about 1.99 million lbs, and the high end (75 × 270 × 144) gets you to about 2.9 million. So “on the order of two million” is a fair description of what that range produces, and the psi figure itself lines up with roughly 0.45-0.48 psi per foot at 156-170ft, which is in the right ballpark for water pressure at that depth (freshwater alone would be closer to 0.43, so there’s a bit of density adjustment built in, maybe for brackish/seawater mixing, which fits the site).

So the math actually holds up on its own terms — it’s not backward-fit, it’s a legitimate depth-to-pressure-to-force chain with a defensible area range. That’s a real result, worth having confidence in as my own independent derivation.

I argue that this intern solves the pigpen inscription by reverse engineering the presumed calculations against the document possible decoding could be done to retrieve Pierre‘s personal key.

I do not think it’s necessary since I have the answer that’s already written there. The decoding would take time and that is not my interest in proving the document real.

This would turn back the 90 foot stone found above the French plug

Decipher as

40 feet down 2,000,000 pounds

Meaning 40 feet below this is 2,000,000 pounds of hydraulic thrust and pressure do not open at high tide

That should be the complete description of the decipher

Which would be Pierre Puget’s personal key

Thank you